768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: − + − + − + − + − + − + − + +
→Example
{
{
Record “This is an anonymous table, since elements in lists can’t have names”
Record “This is an anonymous table, since elements in lists can’t have names”
}
}
{
{
Record “Here’s another table”
Record “Here’s another table”
}
}
]
]
SubTable
SubTable
{
{
Record “I heard you like tables”
Record “I heard you like tables”
}
}
}</nowiki>
}</nowiki>
==In Software Inc.==
==In Software Inc.==
Software Inc. uses a fork of Tynan’s C# implementation of TyD, which you can find here(https://github.com/khornel/TyDSharp).
Software Inc. uses a fork of Tynan’s C# implementation of TyD, which you can find here(https://github.com/khornel/TyDSharp).
If you want to know why Software Inc. switched from XML to TyD, and not something else, you should read the comparison section of the TyD specification.(https://github.com/TynanSylvester/TyD#comparisons) Other than the reasons listed, TyD resembled C# a lot, which reduces friction during development and I would rather not rely on a third party closed-source solution when parsing data.
If you want to know why Software Inc. switched from XML to TyD, and not something else, you should read the comparison section of the TyD specification.(https://github.com/TynanSylvester/TyD#comparisons) Other than the reasons listed, TyD resembled C# a lot, which reduces friction during development and I would rather not rely on a third party closed-source solution when parsing data.